[Bilimsel Haber] Review: Under Eastern Eyes: A Comparative
Introduction to East European Travel Writing on Europe
Gonul Pultar
gpultar at kulturad.org
15 Eyl 2009 Sal 16:45:23 EEST
*Wendy Bracewell, Alex Drace-Francis, eds.* /Under Eastern Eyes: A
Comparative Introduction to East European Travel Writing on Europe./
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/9639776114> East Looks West:
East European Travel Writing, 1550-2000 Series. Budapest: Central
European University Press, 2008. 388 pp. $45.00 (cloth), ISBN
978-963-9776-11-1.
*Reviewed by* Patrice M. Dabrowski
**
*Travels in Time? East European Travelers on Europe*
This interesting and rich volume considers the east European as
traveler--in particular, as a traveler about Europe, one who has
produced travel writing that sheds light on what it means to be
European. The editors of /Under Eastern Eyes/ aver that theirs is "the
first book to analyse the phenomenon of east European travel writing in
a systematic fashion" (p. vii). It most certainly represents part of a
conscientious attempt to lay the foundations for all future study of the
phenomenon. The book under review is part of a larger research project
under the aegis of University College London's School of Slavonic and
East European Studies entitled East Looks West: East European Travel
Writing, 1550-2000. Two other volumes are being published in this
three-part series. Volume 3, /A Bibliography of East European Travel
Writing in Europe/, was published by Central European University Press
in 2008. It contains references to over 4,400 travel accounts published
in book form since circa 1550. Volume 1 (forthcoming) will be entitled
/Orientations: An Anthology of East European Travel Writing on Europe./
The book is comprised of three comparative introductory studies,
followed by nine case studies. In "Towards a Natural History of East
European Travel Writing" (chapter 1), Alex Drace-Francis begins with a
detailed and methodical (indeed, seemingly exhaustive) examination of
the key concepts. "Travel" is defined as "organized, methodized
movement" (p. 4). "East European" is given both geographic and
linguistic dimensions (encompassing "the region between Russia and
Germany, Turkey and Italy," and including works written in "Albanian;
Bosnian, Croatian, Serbian and Serbo-Croatian; Bulgarian; Czech; Greek;
Hebrew and Yiddish; Hungarian; Macedonian; Romanian; Polish; Slovak;
Slovene; and Ukrainian" [p. 6]). Readers of HABSBURG should note that
neither modern Austria nor the Baltic states are included within this
definition, which is used in the companion volumes as well. That said,
a separate section of the bibliography (volume 3) lists travel books
published in other international languages--"languages of international
circulation," defined as "Latin, French, Italian, English, and Russian,"
as well as a "very few" texts in German--by "east Europeans" (as defined
above).[1]
Drace-Francis further analyzes the evolution of writing and printing in
the vernaculars of the region, with an eye to figuring out what gave
rise to travel writing. It is interesting to learn how much early
travel writing by east Europeans concerned itself with "Eastern"
destinations, such as the Ottoman Empire. What apparently caused the
ensuing rift between western and eastern European travel writing were
the major schisms that wreaked havoc on these societies in the sixteenth
through eighteenth centuries, although again more recent scholarship has
provided somewhat of a corrective to this view and is acknowledged
here. As regards how travel writing was enabled in the region,
Drace-Francis singles out four characteristics: the public sphere grew
out of, not in opposition to, courtly culture; diffusion proceeded in a
north-south direction; the public sphere remained local or provincial,
rarely extending to a national scale; and the discursive essay and not
the novel developed above all. Although many travelogues were written
in the earlier period, it was the second half of the nineteenth century
that witnessed an explosion of travel writing in eastern Europe.
The next of the foundational chapters (by David Chirico) deals with the
travel narrative as a literary genre. While its "literary-theoretical
approach" may be of less interest to historians, Chirico is right to
remind us not to forget the literary nature of these texts. He defines
the travel narrative as "a non-fictional first-person prose narrative
describing a person's travel(s) and the spaces passed through or
visited, which is ordered in accordance with, and whose plot is
determined by, the order of the narrator's act of travelling," and
singles out three modes: classical, romantic, and realist, while
presenting some examples of Czech travel texts (pp. 39, 53).
Another foundational chapter--and, at about sixty pages, the most
substantial--is provided by Wendy Bracewell. This comparative tour de
force considers the limits of Europe as delineated by the travel writers
of eastern Europe. What Bracewell argues is that the inhabitants of
this region were no less engaged in mapping Europe than travel writers
in the West, despite certain asymmetries of perception. For example,
the distinction between (local) insider and (cosmopolitan/educated)
outsider was often blurred in the case of east European travelers,
particularly these literate ones. Transnational and comparative
analysis demonstrates, according to Bracewell, "that travelers from both
the east and the west of Europe, each pursuing their own interests,
contributed jointly to definitions of the limits of Europe, coming to
equate the concepts of modernity, progress and cultivation with Europe,
their absence as barbaric, backward and Oriental" (p. 67). Early east
European travel writers were less introspective in this regard (with the
notable exception of the Croatian priest Juraj Kriz(anic'); concepts of
Europe took off during the Enlightenment, yet culture more than
cartography originally determined one's Europeanness (which,
interestingly, could be expressed in degrees). While some used the
travelogue as a tool for reforming their own, more backward, societies,
the varied responses of east European travelers suggest the "limitations
of a psychological-pathological approach to identities and power
relations on Europe's peripheries" (pp. 110-111). Indeed, Bracewell is
careful to note the variety of prisms through which travel could be
refracted, the "multifaceted character of identity discourses
constituted in these borderlands, not just with reference to Europe or
an undifferentiated 'West' or 'East', but to a whole series of /other/
Others" (p. 120).
This richness is partially demonstrated by the remaining nine chapters,
the case studies. Ordered chronologically, they are written by scholars
representing a range of disciplines. Many are quite enlightening. We
learn, for example, that Reform Hungarians who traveled to study
(primarily in the German lands, the Dutch Republic, and England) in the
early modern period viewed the countries of Europe and Europeans through
the prism not of modernity/backwardness but of religious creed (chapter
4 by Graeme Murdock). In another strong chapter demonstrating her
enviable command of multiple languages and travel literatures, Bracewell
examines travels of east Europeans through the Slavic world (in
particular, through the south Slav lands)--that is, through their "own"
lands, beginning from the end of the eighteenth century. Her chapter
features noble Poles Jan Potocki and Alexander Sapieha on a Slavic
mission, in the face of the "rottenness" of the West and the partitions
of their country; the Morlachs of Dalmatia as well as the Montenegrins,
each seen as maintaining, despite obstacles, primeval Slavic virtues;
and east European perceptions of a promising future for Slavs in Europe
and the world (p. 173). Bracewell coins the term "domopis" to denote
the kind of "homeland writing" of the Slavs that she explores here (p.
192). In her chapter, Irina V. Popova-Nowak interestingly considers
modes of transportation--in particular coaches and steamboats--as well
as travel through Hungary's different regions (and abroad) for both
Magyars and Hungary's ethnic minorities as they engaged in an "odyssey
of national discovery" of their little-known country (p. 195). She also
remarks on their travel in time: to the West meant traveling to the
future, to the East to the past.
Andi Mihalache reminds us that much in travel is anticipation of seeing
what has already been imagined. In an at times opaque chapter
nonetheless full of interesting insights, he analyzes the understudied
travelogues of writer Nicolae Iorga, as viewed through the prisms of
metaphor and monumentality. And Zoran Milutinovic has written a
fascinating chapter that also demonstrates the role of the "imaginary,"
this time, of a "Europeanised Balkanite" whose travels to Africa and
assessments of the Africans he encounters--both authentic natives and
Creoles--reveal more about Europeanness (western and eastern alike) than
one might expect (p. 269). Also learning more about himself is the
protagonist of chapter 10, Mihail Sebastian (pen name of the
Romanian-acculturated Jewish intellectual Iosy Hechter), who "became"
Sebastian while on a trip to Paris in the interwar period. In contrast,
socialist travelers to the West were not supposed to undergo any
/Bildung/ or transformation during their stays in "enemy" territory, as
demonstrated by Rossitza Guentcheva. In one of only two chapters
dealing with the post-1945 period, she groups published Bulgarian travel
books on the West into three categories: ultimately banned, criticized,
and acceptable, analyzing each in turn.
Several chapters challenge the definitions provided in the foundational
chapters. For example, the Polish literary scholar Maria Kalinowska
focuses on poetic (as opposed to prose) works of the romantic
period--here, those of Antoni Malczewski, Adam Mickiewicz, and
(especially) Juliusz S?owacki--as these poets wander in proper romantic
form through Europe and beyond (chapter 7). Likewise, the other work
dealing primarily with Polish themes--Katarzyna Murawska-Muthenius's
chapter--argues that Jan Lenica's 1954 sketchbook of London can be
"read" as a "Cold War travel text" (p. 329). The inclusion of poetry
and drawings, although interesting as sources to historians of varying
stripes, nonetheless seems to dilute the effect of what could have been
a tighter volume. Surely there were Polish travel narratives--perhaps
one by a woman (unrepresented here, as they apparently were
underrepresented among east European travel writers)--that could have
been addressed here to round out the collection.
All told, however, this second of the three projected volumes represents
a major step in the direction of laying a solid foundation for the
systematic study of east European travel writing. While the nine case
studies seem to have been assembled in a less systematic way, the
opening three chapters neatly set the stage for further investigations.
They, and the other pieces, should be welcome additions in courses
dealing with travel and tourism as well as depictions of East and West.
Note
[1]. Wendy Bracewell and Alex Drace-Francis, /A Bibliography of East
European Travel Writing in Europe/,/ /East Looks West 3 (Budapest and
New York: Central European University Press, 2008), 487.
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/9639776114/hnetreview-20?dev-t=mason-wrapper%26camp=2025%26link_code=xm2>
If there is additional discussion of this review, you may access it
through the list discussion logs at:
http://h-net.msu.edu/cgi-bin/logbrowse.pl.
*Citation: * Patrice M. Dabrowski. Review of Bracewell, Wendy;
Drace-Francis, Alex, eds., /Under Eastern Eyes: A Comparative
Introduction to East European Travel Writing on Europe/. HABSBURG, H-Net
Reviews. September, 2009.
*URL:* http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=24866
-------------- sonraki bölüm --------------
Bir HTML eklentisi temizlendi...
URL: http://lists.kulturad.org/pipermail/bilimselhaber/attachments/20090915/d4ecb40a/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the BilimselHaber
mailing list