[Discussion] ARI'nin Turkish Policy Quarterly dergisi
sule tarakcioglu
suletar@bilkent.edu.tr
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 09:32:14 -0800
PUBL.- Turkish Policy Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 4 (January 2004)
Turkish Policy Quarterly (TPQ) - in print since 2002 by ARI Movement.
(http://www.ari-tr.org) ARI Movement is an independent social movement,
founded in 1994 in order to produce information-based and participatory
solutions to the challenges faced by Turkey domestically as well as in
the international arena. TPQ is a quarterly printed publication and
provides an international forum for practitioners, opinion leaders and
researchers on Turkey's foreign policy, international relations and
economics. (http://www.turkishpolicy.com)
There are individual and institutional subscription options. In order to
get detailed information or subscribe, you can send a mail to:
subscriptions@turkishpolicy.com or visit:
http://www.turkishpolicy.com/subscript.htm
Central Eurasia related articles and their abstracts in the January 2004
issue (Vol.2 No.4), are:
Turkey and the Caucasus at the Edge of EU and NATO Enlargement, Taleh
Ziyadov and Elin Suleymanov
Abstract:
Turkey's pursuit of the EU membership and the process of the Caucasus'
integration into the Euro-Atlantic structures are parallel, though
unrelated tracks. Yet Europe, whose presence in the strategically
important Caucasus region is still less than adequate, could only
benefit by enlisting Turkey as its member and arm in the Caucasus.
Ankara, too, should build up on its successful partnership with the
pro-Western Azerbaijan and Georgia and see it as a benefit for its EU
membership rather than separate the two directions of Turkey's foreign
policy.
Europe and the Iranian Question, Steven Everts
Abstract:
Iran is becoming the number one agenda item of the international
agenda. This paper explores the relationship between three dimensions
of the topic: Iran's quest for nuclear weapons, internal dynamics of the
regime, and Transatlantic relations as they relate to Iran. The inherent
conflicts between approaches towards Iran are taken up in light of the
impact to domestic reforms and potential security threats.
Everts outlines the consequences for Europe of the various US policy
options towards Iran and analyses the links among policy formulations.
Focusing on the need for the EU to come up with effective and creative
policies, Everts points out that Europe, and especially Britain, must
influence America in order to forestall a collision between Washington
and Tehran, prevent a transatlantic divide and consequently a serious
fragmentation within the EU.